Case 2300909/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss D Bartlett v Ace Hygiene Supplies Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2300909/2023
- Decision date
- 13 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ramsden Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss D Bartlett
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued on 24 February 2023 and the respondent did not present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge therefore made a Rule 21 determination on the papers. The judgment records that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £530.86 gross in respect of that claim.
The judgment also records that the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement of 25 days and ordered payment of £2,392.50 gross for that failure. The total sum due to the claimant was £2,923.36 gross. The judgment further states that the claimant must account to HMRC for any sums owed in respect of any payment received pursuant to the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £530.86 gross. | Upheld | — | £531 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement of 25 days and ordered payment of £2,392.50 gross. | Upheld | — | £2,393 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,923
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.