Case 2300916/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs L Maugham (in person) v All Signs Solutions Ltd (04675840) — 2021
- Case reference
- 2300916/2021
- Decision date
- 29 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs L Maugham (in person)
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs L Maugham's claim against All Signs Solutions Limited was heard at London South on 29 November 2021. The respondent had not filed a response and did not attend. The tribunal noted that the claim had been issued out of time, but was satisfied on the claimant's submissions that it had been presented as soon as was reasonably practicable after the time limit expired, so the claim could continue.
Because the respondent had not complied with Rule 21, the tribunal entered summary judgment against it. The judgment ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £9,275, and stated that the claimant would account to HMRC for any tax purposes.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The written reasons do not identify the legal heads of claim. The judgment records that the claim was issued out of time, was allowed to continue because it had been presented as soon as was reasonably practicable after expiry, and that summary judgment was entered under Rule 21 for £9,275. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £9,275
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.