Case 2300935/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Ms S Boyd, Health & Safety Executive — 2020
- Case reference
- 2300935/2019
- Decision date
- 20 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Truscott QC
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn its decision of 9 December 2020, Employment Judge Truscott QC dealt with Shiva Limited's email of 3 December 2020 seeking reconsideration of the Tribunal's earlier decision sent on 20 November 2020, which had refused an application for a stay of proceedings. The Tribunal treated the request as one under Rule 70 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 and considered the appellant's further comments together with its own review of the earlier decision and reasons.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Application for reconsideration of the decision sent on 20 November 2020, treated as an application under Rule 70 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The Tribunal refused the application because there were no grounds to revisit the original decision and no reasonable prospect of it being varied or revoked. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 70 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- interests of justice
- reasonable prospect of the original decision being varied or revoked
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.