Case 2300938/2021 · Employment Tribunal

BALPA v Norwegian Air Resources UK Limited - In Liquidation — 2021

Case reference: 2300938/2021
Decision date: 15 September 2021
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge McLaren Date

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

BALPA

Respondent

Norwegian Air Resources UK Limited - In Liquidation

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

This was a Rule 21 judgment in which the tribunal found that Norwegian Air Resources UK Limited, in liquidation, failed to comply with its obligations under section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. The claim therefore succeeded.

The judgment does not set out any detailed factual findings beyond the statutory breach. It records that the claimant was BALPA and that the respondent was Norwegian Air Resources UK Limited - In Liquidation.

No remedy was fixed in the judgment. The tribunal stated that the remedy to which the claimant was entitled would be determined at a remedy hearing.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Trade union	Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal found that the respondent failed to comply with its obligations under section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. The remedy was not determined in this judgment and was to be decided at a remedy hearing.	Upheld	—	—

Legal tests applied

2 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the .

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.