Case 2300941/2020 · Employment Tribunal
in person For the v Respondent — 2021
- Case reference
- 2300941/2020
- Decision date
- 4 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Richardson Signed
Parties
1 namedClaimant
in person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Croydon on 3 and 4 March 2021, Employment Judge A Richardson held that case number 2300941/2020 was subject to the principle of res judicata because claim number 1406410/2019 in the South West Employment Tribunals had been withdrawn and dismissed on 26 February 2020.
The tribunal therefore dismissed the claims in this case. The written record states that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested, and it records no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment dismisses the claims in this case on the basis of res judicata arising from the earlier withdrawal and dismissal of claim number 1406410/2019 on 26 February 2020. It does not give a separate finding on this head. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Whistleblowing | The judgment dismisses the claims in this case on the basis of res judicata arising from the earlier withdrawal and dismissal of claim number 1406410/2019 on 26 February 2020. It does not give a separate finding on this head. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment dismisses the claims in this case on the basis of res judicata arising from the earlier withdrawal and dismissal of claim number 1406410/2019 on 26 February 2020. It does not give a separate finding on this head. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- res judicata
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 4 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the .
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.