Case 2300941/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Preston Lennox v Intsol Solutions Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2300941/2023
- Decision date
- 12 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sudra
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Preston Lennox
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the claim. In a letter dated 6 September 2024, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The stated procedural context was that the respondent had not complied with rule 37(c) and had not complied with the tribunal order dated 30 July 2024.
The tribunal recorded that the claimant did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the tribunal struck out the claim.
The final hearing listed for 16 and 17 September 2024 remained listed, but the tribunal stated that the respondent would only be able to participate to the extent that an Employment Judge considered appropriate.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment text does not identify the substantive claim type. This classification is taken from the case listing context supplied with the extraction task, which described the matter as Disability Discrimination. | Struck out | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.