Case 2300942/2018 · Employment Tribunal
1) Mrs L Craig 2) Mr T McInally 3) Miss G Smith v Lagan Construction Group Limited (in Administration) — 2019
- Case reference
- 2300942/2018
- Decision date
- 16 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Freer Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
1) Mrs L Craig 2) Mr T McInally 3) Miss G Smith
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal sat at London South Tribunals on 8 November 2019 before Employment Judge Freer. Neither side attended. The tribunal said it considered the information available to it and then gave judgment on 16 December 2019.
The only substantive outcome recorded in the judgment is that the applications by Mrs L Craig and Mr T McInally for a protective award were not well founded. The judgment does not record any separate award, and it does not set out further findings of fact or legal reasoning in the extracted text provided.
Miss G Smith is named in the case heading, but the body of the judgment does not refer to any separate claim or outcome for her. No monetary award is stated.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment states that Mrs L Craig and Mr T McInally applied for a protective award and that those applications were not well founded. Miss G Smith is listed in the case heading, but the judgment does not separately mention any application by her. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.