Case 2300951/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Egenti v Abellio London Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2300951/2022
- Decision date
- 30 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge A.M.S. Green
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Egenti
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant was employed as a bus driver and was summarily dismissed after CCTV footage from 5 November 2021 was reviewed. The respondent alleged dangerous driving by excessive speed, contravention of a red traffic light signal, use of abusive language, failure to allow passengers sufficient time to reach a safe place before pulling away, and conduct likely to give offence to customers.
The tribunal found that misconduct was the reason for dismissal. It accepted that the CCTV footage was reliable and that the respondent had reasonable grounds for believing the claimant had committed misconduct. The tribunal found that the investigation and disciplinary process were reasonable, that the claimant knew the charges he had to answer, had an opportunity to respond and present mitigation, was accompanied by trade union representatives, and had an appeal heard by a different decision maker.
The tribunal concluded that dismissal was within the range of reasonable responses, given the respondent's health and safety responsibilities as a bus operator and the evidence before the disciplinary officer. The unfair dismissal claim was dismissed. The separate claim for “other payments” described as breach of contract was withdrawn and dismissed upon withdrawal.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found that the respondent dismissed the claimant for misconduct and that dismissal was within the range of reasonable responses. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment describes this as a claim for “other payments” (breach of contract), which was dismissed upon withdrawal at the hearing. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
8 references- s.95 ERA 1996
- s.98 ERA 1996
- British Home Stores Limited v Burchell 1980 ICR 303
- Acas Code
- Hope v British Medical Association 2022 IRLR 206
- s.98(4) ERA 1996
- Iceland Frozen Foods Limited v Jones [1982] IRLR 439
- range of reasonable responses
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.