Case 2300955/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Baker v Coty Manufacturing UK Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2300955/2022
- Decision date
- 6 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Harrington Appearances
- Venue
- Remote hearing
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Baker
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe written judgment is a short record of an oral decision by Employment Judge Harrington at a remote hearing on 6 September 2023. It states that from 4 February 2021 Mr A Baker was disabled, within section 6 of the Equality Act 2010, by reason of atrial fibrillation, and that Coty Manufacturing UK Limited had knowledge of that disability.
The supplied record does not set out any further substantive findings on liability and does not record any monetary award. It also notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would only be provided if requested within 14 days of the written record.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The written judgment records that from 4 February 2021 the claimant was disabled within section 6 of the Equality Act 2010 by reason of atrial fibrillation, and that the respondent had knowledge of that disability. It does not record a final merits outcome or any monetary award. | Other | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.