Case 2300966/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Akrap v Plane Tree Hospitality Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2300966/2023
- Decision date
- 31 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Kumar Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Akrap
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt London South (by CVP) on 31 August 2023, Employment Judge Kumar heard the case with Mr T Akrap appearing in person and Plane Tree Hospitality Ltd not attending. The tribunal recorded that the claim for unlawful deduction of wages succeeded and that the claim for unfair dismissal succeeded.
On the unlawful deduction of wages claim, the tribunal ordered payment of holiday pay of £971.71 gross, expenses of £271.27, unpaid wages of £4,788.48 gross, pension of £220.14, and consequential loss of £1,217.08. The extracted judgment does not set out further factual findings beyond the award itself, but the listed sums total £7,468.68 for this claim.
On the unfair dismissal claim, the tribunal awarded a basic award of £1,730.80 gross and a compensatory award of £7,843.81. The compensatory award is described in the judgment as being subject to a 20% uplift for failure to follow the ACAS Code of Practice. The judgment also states that gross figures are to be paid net of the required deductions for tax and national insurance.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment awarded holiday pay (£971.71), expenses (£271.27), unpaid wages (£4,788.48), pension (£220.14) and consequential loss (£1,217.08) under this head. | Upheld | — | £7,469 |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment awarded a basic award of £1,730.80 and a compensatory award of £7,843.81, described as subject to a 20% uplift for failure to follow the ACAS Code of Practice. | Upheld | — | £9,575 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £17,043
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £1,731
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £7,844
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.