Case 2300969/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Giovanni Zannelli v v ‘O Ver Borough Limited (in creditors’ voluntary liquidation) — 2022
- Case reference
- 2300969/2021
- Decision date
- 31 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Giovanni Zannelli v
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal upheld the claimant's breach of contract claim. It found that Giovanni Zannelli was dismissed without notice on 18/12/2020, even though he was entitled under his employment contract to 10 weeks' notice and one week of accrued untaken holiday. The judgment records his gross weekly pay at the time as £779.31, with gross monthly pay of £3,277.00.
The tribunal also applied a 25% increase to the compensation due because of the respondent's unreasonable failure to comply with the applicable codes of practice relating to the resolution of disputes. The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant the gross sum of £10,715.48 in total.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal held that the claimant was dismissed without notice on 18/12/2020, when he was entitled under his contract to 10 weeks' notice and one week of accrued untaken holiday. The judgment records a gross weekly pay of £779.31 and a gross monthly pay of £3,277.00. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,715
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.