Case 2300976/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Top Notch Nannies & Staffing Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2300976/2019
- Decision date
- 13 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hyams-Parish
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in favour of four claimants: Mr S Perry, Miss A Cattermole, Mr E Johnson and Mrs H Cole. The tribunal found that Top Notch Nannies & Staffing Limited had made unauthorised deductions from wages and had failed to pay notice pay.
The judgment ordered payment of two weeks’ wages and one month’s notice pay for each claimant. Mr Perry was awarded £711.54 for wages and £1,255.87 for notice pay; Miss Cattermole £807.69 and £1,472.04; Mr Johnson £920.55 and £1,472.04; and Mrs Cole £1,384.15 and £1,641.92.
The judgment also records that the claimant is responsible for payment of tax and national insurance due on the sums, if any. The resulting total awarded by the judgment is £9,665.80.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment: the respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimants’ wages. This amount is the total of the wage sums ordered for Mr Perry, Miss Cattermole, Mr Johnson and Mrs Cole. | Upheld | — | £3,824 |
| Breach of contract | Rule 21 judgment: the respondent failed to pay notice pay. This amount is the total of the notice pay sums ordered for the four claimants. | Upheld | — | £5,842 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £9,666
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.