Case 2300986/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Brendan Rosekelly v Mama Fuego Ltd FINAL HEARING — 2021
- Case reference
- 2300986/2020
- Decision date
- 17 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Brendan Rosekelly
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr Brendan Rosekelly, was employed as bar manager from 9 September 2019 to 23 December 2019. The tribunal found that the parties had an original written contract providing for 48 hours per week, salary of £26,000 gross plus tronc, a two-month notice period, and a clause requiring any variation or termination to be in writing and signed by both parties. A second contract was sent on 23 October 2019, increasing salary to £30,000 and reducing notice, but the claimant did not sign it and disputed that it captured all that had been agreed orally.
The tribunal concluded, on the balance of probabilities, that either no full agreement was reached on the proposed changes or any oral agreement was not reflected in the second contract. It held that the first contract continued to govern the employment relationship because the contractual clause requiring signed written variation had not been complied with. On that basis, the claim for payment in lieu of additional hours worked failed, because the first contract contained no provision for payment or time off in lieu for extra hours.
The claim for notice pay succeeded. The tribunal found that the probationary period ended on 8 December 2019, notice of termination was given on 15 December 2019, and the respondent gave only one week's notice when the first contract required two months' notice. The tribunal also held that the claimant could not rely on selected terms from the second contract while relying on the first contract for notice; his salary remained £26,000 per year plus tronc for the purpose of working out the notice entitlement, with credit to be given for any overpayment. The judgment did not quantify the final sum, and the parties were invited to agree it or return for a further short decision if necessary.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Claim for unpaid expenses was withdrawn because the claimant said he did not have the evidential material to support it. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Claim for payment in lieu of additional hours worked / lieu days failed because the first contract made no provision for such payment or time off in lieu. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Claim for two months' notice pay succeeded. The tribunal held that the first contract remained governing and that notice was given on 15 December 2019 after the probationary period had expired on 8 December 2019, so one week's notice was insufficient. No quantified sum was set in the judgment; the parties were invited to agree the amount, with credit for any overpayment of salary. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.