Case 2301004/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Oliver Gridley v SCL Technology Limited and 1 other — 2022
- Case reference
- 2301004/2022
- Decision date
- 8 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Pritchard Representation
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr Oliver Gridley
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard on 8 December 2022 by Employment Judge Pritchard under Rule 21 after neither respondent had presented an ET3. The Second Respondent was dismissed from the proceedings. The claimant gave evidence and the tribunal found on the balance of probabilities that the First Respondent was his employer, noting that he had been paid by the First Respondent throughout apart from the final part-payment in December 2021, which was paid by the Second Respondent because of the First Respondent's financial difficulties.
On the wages claim, the tribunal found that the First Respondent had not provided payslips, so the claimant could not calculate gross pay, tax or National Insurance deductions. Using the claimant's spreadsheet, the tribunal accepted an underpayment of net wages of £5,610.72 for August to December 2021 and unpaid net wages of £900.00 for January 2022, making total unpaid wages of £6,510.72 net. Judgment was entered for that sum under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
The tribunal also found that the First Respondent had failed to provide a written statement of employment particulars. Applying section 38 of the Employment Act 2002, and using the claimant's net weekly wage of £357.73, the tribunal awarded a further two weeks' pay of £715.46. The overall monetary award therefore totalled £7,226.18.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the First Respondent made unlawful deductions from wages and ordered payment of the net underpaid wages. | Upheld | — | £6,511 |
| Other | The tribunal found that the First Respondent had failed to provide a written statement of employment particulars and made a section 38 Employment Act 2002 award of two weeks' pay. | Upheld | — | £715 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,226
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
6 references- Rule 21
- Rule 47
- section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 1 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 4(1) Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 38 Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.