Case 2301008/2022 · Employment Tribunal
(1) Dr Seamina Khan (2) Mr Idrees Muhammad v General Medical Council — 2023
- Case reference
- 2301008/2022
- Decision date
- 10 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Fowell Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
(1) Dr Seamina Khan (2) Mr Idrees Muhammad
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim form was submitted on 17 March 2022 by Dr Seamina Khan and also named Mr Idrees Muhammad. The Tribunal found that the basic prescribed information was never submitted on the claim form and no early conciliation certificate number was provided, so no valid claim had been presented. It also noted that no details of any claim by Mr Muhammad were provided and no correspondence was received from him throughout the proceedings.
Dr Khan withdrew her claim on 23 May 2022, and the Tribunal subsequently dismissed her claim on withdrawal. In relation to Mr Muhammad, the Tribunal emailed him on 7 October 2022 asking whether he intended to pursue the claim; Dr Khan replied that he was deceased. The Tribunal said a personal representative could pursue a claim on behalf of a deceased claimant, but no correspondence had been received on Mr Muhammad's behalf, so the claim was struck out for having no reasonable prospects of success and for not having been actively pursued.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Dr Khan submitted the claim form on 17 March 2022 and later withdrew her claim on 23 May 2022. The Tribunal then dismissed her claim on withdrawal. The reasons state that the basic prescribed information was never submitted and no early conciliation certificate number was provided, so no valid claim was presented. The reasons also refer once to 'Dr Mohammed', which appears to be an inconsistency in the extracted text. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | No details of any claim by Mr Muhammad were provided on the claim form, and no correspondence was received from him during the proceedings. The Tribunal emailed him on 7 October 2022; Dr Khan replied that he was deceased. The Tribunal struck out the claim because it had no reasonable prospects of success and had not been actively pursued. The reasons refer to 'Mr Mohammed' in places, which appears to be an inconsistency in the extracted text. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.