Case 2301022/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Razzaq v The Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis — 2026
- Case reference
- 2301022/2022
- Decision date
- 2 July 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Braganza KC
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Razzaq
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr M Razzaq's complaint of discrimination arising from disability under section 15 of the Equality Act 2010 was found not well-founded and was dismissed.
His complaint that the Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis failed to make reasonable adjustments under sections 20 and 21 of the Equality Act 2010 was also found not well-founded and was dismissed. The judgment records no monetary award or other remedy; summary reasons were given orally at the hearing, and the written judgment does not record the tribunal's factual findings or further reasoning.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Complaint of discrimination arising from disability under section 15 of the Equality Act 2010; found not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Complaint of failure to make reasonable adjustments under sections 20 and 21 of the Equality Act 2010; found not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.