Case 2301025/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Maurice Trotman v Royal Star & Garter Homes — 2023
- Case reference
- 2301025/2022
- Decision date
- 21 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Krepski Representation
- Venue
- London South via CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Maurice Trotman
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records two discrimination claims brought by Maurice Trotman against The Royal Star & Garter Homes: discrimination on the basis of disability and discrimination on the basis of religion or belief. Both claims were dismissed upon withdrawal. The record does not set out substantive findings on the merits of either complaint.
No remedy was awarded and the written record does not include any monetary figures. The decision also notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the note at the end of the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Dismissed upon withdrawal; the judgment does not record a substantive merits determination. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | Dismissed upon withdrawal; the judgment does not record a substantive merits determination. | Dismissed | Religion or belief | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.