Case 2301037/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Y Houti v Bills Restaurants Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2301037/2021
- Decision date
- 19 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McCann Representation
- Venue
- Croydon
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Y Houti
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt an open preliminary hearing on 18 January 2023, heard remotely via CVP at Croydon, Employment Judge McCann heard submissions from Mr Andrew Cromb for the Claimant and Mr Stuart Morley for the Respondent. The written record states that, for the reasons given orally at the hearing, the Claimant's claims were not struck out under Rule 37(1) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
The written judgment does not set out the tribunal's oral reasons or determine the substantive merits of the pleaded claims. It records only that the claims remained in issue after the respondent's strike-out application was refused, and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the written record being sent.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Underlying claim category taken from case metadata; the written decision only records that the Claimant's claims were not struck out under Rule 37(1). | Other | — | — |
| Race discrimination | Underlying claim category taken from case metadata; the written decision only records that the Claimant's claims were not struck out under Rule 37(1). | Other | Race | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Underlying claim category taken from case metadata; the written decision only records that the Claimant's claims were not struck out under Rule 37(1). | Other | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Underlying claim category taken from case metadata; the written decision only records that the Claimant's claims were not struck out under Rule 37(1). | Other | — | — |
| Working time regulations | Underlying claim category taken from case metadata; the written decision only records that the Claimant's claims were not struck out under Rule 37(1). | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 37(1) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.