Case 2301039/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Mohammed Miah v Ralex Construction Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2301039/2021
- Decision date
- 28 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge E Fowell Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Mohammed Miah
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Croydon by video on 28 July 2022 before Employment Judge E Fowell. Mr Mohammed Miah appeared in person and Ralex Construction Limited did not attend. The judgment records that reasons were given orally at the hearing, and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
The tribunal upheld Mr Miah's complaint that his dismissal was in breach of contract and awarded him £923.54 for that claim. It also upheld his complaint of unlawful deduction from wages and awarded £2,091.23.
A further complaint of breach of the Working Time Regulations 1998 in relation to outstanding holiday pay was upheld, with £646.45 awarded. The tribunal therefore awarded a total of £3,661.22.
The employer's contract claim was dismissed because the respondent failed to attend the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal held that the dismissal was in breach of contract. | Upheld | — | £924 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The complaint of unlawful deduction from wages was upheld. | Upheld | — | £2,091 |
| Holiday pay | The complaint of breach of the Working Time Regulations 1998 in relation to outstanding holiday pay was upheld. | Upheld | — | £646 |
| Breach of contract | The respondent's contract claim was dismissed after the respondent failed to attend the hearing. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,661
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.