Case 2301042/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v CNH2016 Ltd (In Liquidation) and Secretary of State for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy — 2021
- Case reference
- 2301042/2018
- Decision date
- 9 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Balogun Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis corrected judgment records that the claim against the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy was struck out. By letter dated 3 April 2019, the claimant was told that an Employment Judge considered the claim to have no reasonable prospect of success for the reasons set out in paragraph 19 of the second respondent’s grounds of resistance.
The claimant was given an opportunity to make written representations by 17 April 2019 explaining why the claim should not be struck out, but no written representations were received. The tribunal therefore struck out the claim.
The judgment does not record any substantive determination of the underlying employment claims against CNH2016 Ltd (In Liquidation), and it contains no award of compensation or other monetary remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment states that the claim against the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy was struck out because the claimant was given notice that an Employment Judge considered it to have no reasonable prospect of success, but no written representations were received by the deadline. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.