Case 2301045/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs G. L. Catotal Diaz v Jungle Pubs Oakwood Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2301045/2022
- Decision date
- 8 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T Perry
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs G. L. Catotal Diaz
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 8 June 2022 Employment Judge T Perry entered a Rule 21 judgment after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The tribunal ordered Jungle Pubs Oakwood Limited to pay Mrs G. L. Catotal Diaz the gross sum of £1,538.40 for unpaid holiday entitlement.
The tribunal also recorded that the claimant’s unfair dismissal claim and her claim for failure to provide particulars of employment succeeded. The judgment did not determine the remedy for those claims at that stage; instead, the hearing listed for 16 September 2022 was converted to a Remedy Hearing.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The respondent failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and was ordered to pay £1,538.40 gross. | Upheld | — | £1,538 |
| Unfair dismissal | The claim succeeded; remedy is to be determined at the Remedy Hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
| Other | Failure to provide particulars of employment; remedy is to be determined at the Remedy Hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,538
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.