Case 2301046/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Holness v Crystal Extension Architecture Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2301046/2019
- Decision date
- 15 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Webster Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N Holness
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the claim. It recorded that the respondent company had been dissolved and that the claimant had not applied to have it restored to the Register of Companies.
The tribunal also noted that, on 17 April 2020, the claimant had been given an opportunity to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The claimant failed to give an acceptable reason.
On those grounds, Employment Judge Webster held that the claim was struck out. The extracted judgment does not record any substantive liability findings or any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive claim type in the extracted text; it records only that 'the claim' was struck out because the respondent company had been dissolved and the claimant had not applied to restore it, and because the claimant failed to give an acceptable reason after being given an opportunity on 17 April 2020. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.