Case 2301048/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Dalvi Alves v GreenLight — 2023
- Case reference
- 2301048/2023
- Decision date
- 1 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Khalil Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Dalvi Alves
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Khalil dated 1 September 2023 struck out the claimant's complaint of 'Redundancy Payment / Notice Pay'. The tribunal had issued a letter on 28 March 2023 inviting representations or a hearing on whether that complaint should be struck out because the claimant did not have the qualifying two years' service under section 155 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and there were no exceptional circumstances identified to disapply that service requirement.
The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the redundancy payment / notice pay complaint. The reasons note that the claimant's remaining claim for unpaid wages continued and was not determined in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The judgment refers to the complaint as 'Redundancy Payment / Notice Pay'. It was struck out because the claimant did not have the qualifying two years' service under section 155 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and identified no exceptional circumstances for exemption. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 155 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.