Case 2301052/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Samuels v The Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis — 2020
- Case reference
- 2301052/2019
- Decision date
- 6 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tsamados
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Samuels
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt an open preliminary hearing, the Tribunal considered whether it had jurisdiction to hear Miss Samuels's complaint of disability discrimination. The complaint related to the respondent's instruction to Reed Specialist Recruitment Ltd to terminate her work assignment.
The Tribunal held that it had jurisdiction to hear that complaint. The judgment records that reasons were given orally and that written reasons would only be provided if requested within the applicable time limit.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Open preliminary hearing judgment only determined that the Tribunal had jurisdiction to hear the disability discrimination complaint concerning the respondent's instruction to Reed Specialist Recruitment Ltd to terminate the claimant's work assignment. It did not determine the merits of the discrimination complaint. | Other | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.