Case 2301057/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M R Herbert v London Catering and Hygiene Solutions Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2301057/2019
- Decision date
- 23 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tsamados
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M R Herbert
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a judgment by consent in Mr M R Herbert's claim against London Catering and Hygiene Solutions Ltd. The tribunal recorded that terms of settlement had been agreed between the parties in a confidential schedule attached to the tribunal file.
By consent, the claim was to be withdrawn upon the respondent complying with the settlement terms on or before 14 October 2019. The tribunal also gave liberty to apply on or before 28 October 2019, and stated that if no application was made by that date, the claim would be dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant.
The judgment does not record any merits findings, liability findings, or monetary award. It is therefore a settlement disposal rather than a substantive determination of the unfair dismissal claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Judgment by consent records that terms of settlement were agreed in a confidential schedule. The claim was to be withdrawn upon compliance by the respondent with the settlement terms on or before 14 October 2019, with liberty to apply by 28 October 2019; if no application was made, the claim would be dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Settled | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.