Case 2301062/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. A. Szabo v Royal Mail Group Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2301062/2023
- Decision date
- 19 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sudra Sitting
- Venue
- London South
- Panel members
- Ms. C. Edwards, Ms. H. Carter
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. A. Szabo
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case at London South Employment Tribunal on 11, 12 and 13 March 2024 before Employment Judge Sudra sitting with members Ms C. Edwards and Ms H. Carter.
The judgment records that the claimant's claims of automatic unfair dismissal and ordinary unfair dismissal were dismissed. The written judgment states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would only be provided if requested within the specified time.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | The judgment states that the claimant's claim of automatic unfair dismissal was dismissed. The supplied listing category refers to trade union membership, but the judgment text itself does not set out reasons. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the claimant's claim of ordinary unfair dismissal was dismissed. Oral reasons were given, but no written reasons are included in the supplied judgment text. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.