Case 2301066/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Carr v Edwards Taxi and Minibuses — 2022
- Case reference
- 2301066/2019
- Decision date
- 15 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Webster Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Carr
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 23 February 2022, the tribunal gave the respondent an opportunity to explain why the response should not be struck out for not being actively pursued. The respondent did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
The tribunal therefore struck out the response. It recorded that the respondent would still be entitled to notice of any hearings and decisions, but could only participate in any hearing to the extent permitted by the Employment Judge. The judgment does not contain findings on the merits of the underlying claims or any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not decide the underlying employment claims on their merits. It records only that the response was struck out because the respondent had not actively pursued the case and had not made sufficient representations or requested a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.