Case 2301069/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Henderson v Sugo Holdings Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2301069/2023
- Decision date
- 14 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McLaren Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Henderson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the London South Employment Tribunals on 7 March 2023. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, so Employment Judge McLaren determined the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 without a contested hearing.
The tribunal found that Sugo Holdings Limited had made unauthorised deductions from Mr A Henderson’s wages. It ordered the respondent to pay £2,570 gross to the claimant. The judgment states that the claimant is responsible for any figures owed to HMRC in respect of tax or national insurance contributions.
The bottom-line amount payable under the judgment was £2,570, and the hearing listed for 6 September 2023 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Determined under rule 21 because the respondent did not present a valid response on time. The judgment states the respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages and must pay £2,570 gross. | Upheld | — | £2,570 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,570
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.