Case 2301086/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss T de Bique v EMC Computer Systems (UK) Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2301086/2019
- Decision date
- 3 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Burge Appearances
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss T de Bique
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt London South Employment Tribunal on 3 November 2021, Employment Judge L Burge dealt with the case management position in Miss T de Bique's claims against EMC Computer Systems (UK) Ltd. The judgment records that the claimant was appearing in person and the respondent was represented by counsel.
The tribunal struck out the claimant’s claims relating to matters dated prior to February 2018 as an abuse of process. The extracted text does not identify the underlying claim categories within that struck-out group.
The tribunal also recorded that the claimant’s holiday pay, notice pay and arrears of pay claims were dismissed upon withdrawal. The judgment does not record any monetary award or liability finding for those claims.
The remaining claims of constructive unfair dismissal and disability discrimination were to proceed. This judgment therefore resolved preliminary disposal issues only and did not determine the merits of those remaining claims or any remedy.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Claims in relation to matters dated prior to February 2018 were struck out as an abuse of process; the extracted text does not identify the underlying claim types. | Struck out | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The holiday pay claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The notice pay claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The arrears of pay claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Constructive dismissal | The remaining constructive unfair dismissal claim was allowed to proceed; no final merits outcome is recorded in this judgment. | Other | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The remaining disability discrimination claim was allowed to proceed; no final merits outcome is recorded in this judgment. | Other | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.