Case 2301087/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Miss J Ward v Stagecoach South Western Trains Ltd — 2017
- Case reference
- 2301087/2017
- Decision date
- 12 December 2017
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hildebrand Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss J Ward
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment dated 12 December 2017 records that the proceedings in case 2301087/2017, Miss J Ward v Stagecoach South Western Trains Ltd, were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The extracted text does not contain any merits findings, liability analysis, or factual reasoning beyond that disposal.
No monetary award is recorded in the judgment, and no remedy calculation is set out. Because the text is limited to the dismissal following withdrawal, there are no further claim-specific findings to summarise from the judgment itself.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant; it contains no separate merits finding on this claim. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Sex discrimination | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant; it contains no separate merits finding on this claim. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant; it contains no separate merits finding on this claim. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.