Case 2301091/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr F Leyser v What’s new pussycat Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 2301091/2025
- Decision date
- 24 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wright Employment
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr F Leyser
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented on 28 January 2025. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge determined the matter under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure. No hearing on 19 May 2025 was therefore required and was cancelled.
The tribunal found that Mr F Leyser had been dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment. It recorded that he was aged 66 when made redundant, had worked for the respondent for 10 years, and had a weekly pay of £241.61. On that basis, the tribunal calculated the statutory redundancy payment at 1.5 weeks' pay for each year worked, producing a total award of £3,624.15.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal determined that the claimant had been dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment calculated from his age, length of service, and weekly pay. | Upheld | — | £3,624 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,624
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.