Case 2301092/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Williams v Premier Display Systems Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2301092/2020
- Decision date
- 22 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Balogun Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Williams
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Mr J Williams was unfairly dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £4,680. It recorded that no compensatory award was made because the dismissal would have taken place in any event due to the cessation of the respondent's business.
The tribunal also found an unauthorised deduction from wages in respect of the claimant's November 2019 salary and ordered the respondent to pay £1,350 gross. In addition, it found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £3,115.50.
Finally, the tribunal found that the respondent failed to provide itemised payslips pursuant to section 8 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The judgment does not record a separate monetary award for that finding.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was unfairly dismissed by reason of redundancy and awarded a redundancy payment of £4,680. It made no compensatory award because the dismissal would have taken place in any event due to the cessation of the respondent's business. | Upheld | — | £4,680 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's November 2019 salary and ordered the respondent to pay £1,350 gross. | Upheld | — | £1,350 |
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £3,115.50. | Upheld | — | £3,116 |
| Other | The tribunal found the respondent failed to provide itemised payslips pursuant to section 8 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. No separate monetary award was stated for this finding. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £9,146
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £4,680
- statutory, unfair dismissal
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.