Case 2301098/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Redmond v The Goldsmith Group/Goldsmith (London) Ltd and Professional Construction Recruitment Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2301098/2019
- Decision date
- 16 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge K Andrews Preliminary
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary reconsideration hearing before Employment Judge K Andrews on 16 September 2019, held by telephone. The tribunal considered the rejection of the claim against Mr C Cavallari, which had been notified on 16 May 2019 because the claim form did not contain the required early conciliation number under rule 10(1)(c) of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Preliminary reconsideration of the rejection of the claim against Mr C Cavallari under rule 13(1)(b) and (4) of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013; the original rejection under rule 10(1)(c) was set aside and the claim was to be treated as presented on 24 May 2019. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- rule 10(1)(c) Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
- rule 13(1)(b) Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
- rule 13(4) Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.