Case 2301118/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs T O’Dea v Sunrose Care Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2301118/2022
- Decision date
- 15 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cansick Representation
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs T O’Dea
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs T O'Dea brought a claim for unlawful deduction of wages against Sunrose Care Limited. The hearing was conducted at London South by CVP on 15 August 2022 before Employment Judge Cansick, with the claimant appearing in person and no attendance for the respondent.
The tribunal amended the respondent's name to Sunrose Care Limited and held that the claimant's complaint of unlawful deduction of wages was well-founded. It ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £106.81, being the amount unlawfully deducted. The written record states that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and therefore no separate written reasons were provided.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the claimant's complaint of unlawful deduction of wages well-founded and ordered the respondent to pay the gross sum of £106.81. | Upheld | — | £107 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £107
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.