Case 2301119/2019 · Employment Tribunal

Mrs G Gray v J.Com Ltd and 1 other — 2021

Case reference: 2301119/2019
Decision date: 3 March 2021
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Hyams-Parish

Indexed: 22 May 2026

Parties

3 named

Claimant

Mrs G Gray

Respondents

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The judgment was issued under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The tribunal recorded that the claims against the First Respondent succeeded because its response had been struck out. Those successful claims were disability discrimination, unfair dismissal, and unlawful deductions from wages, including unpaid holiday pay.

The judgment also states that nothing in it affected the claims against the Second Respondent, and that those claims were to be determined at a final hearing. Remedy was expressly left to a separate hearing, so no award is recorded in this judgment.

Claims and outcomes

3 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Disability discrimination	The claim against the First Respondent succeeded because its response was struck out under Rule 21.	Upheld	Disability	—
Unfair dismissal	The claim against the First Respondent succeeded because its response was struck out under Rule 21.	Upheld	—	—
Unlawful deduction from wages	The claim was described as unlawful deductions from wages, including unpaid holiday pay, and succeeded because the First Respondent's response was struck out under Rule 21.	Upheld	—	—

Legal tests applied

1 reference

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.