Case 2301130/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs B Peters v Country Court Care Homes 2 Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2301130/2024
- Decision date
- 3 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Burge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs B Peters
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant complained of unfair dismissal, race discrimination and sex discrimination. The tribunal considered only whether the unfair dismissal complaint should be struck out at this stage.
The claim form stated that the claimant had been employed from 9 January 2023 until 16 October 2023. The tribunal referred to section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, which requires not less than two years' service for an unfair dismissal complaint, and stated that the claimant's response did not indicate that an exception applied.
The unfair dismissal complaint was struck out. The judgment states that the race and sex discrimination complaints continue.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The complaint was struck out under section 108 ERA because the claim form stated employment from 9 January 2023 to 16 October 2023 and the claimant's response did not indicate that an exception applied. | Struck out | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment states that the race discrimination complaint continues; it was not adjudicated in this judgment. | Other | Race | — |
| Sex discrimination | The judgment states that the sex discrimination complaint continues; it was not adjudicated in this judgment. | Other | Sex | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.