Case 2301131/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Ajeet Kumar v Lewisham & Greenwich NHS Trust — 2023
- Case reference
- 2301131/2022
- Decision date
- 31 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge E Fowell Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Ajeet Kumar
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal considered at a preliminary hearing whether Mr Kumar's claims had been presented in time. The whistleblowing claim concerned alleged detriments following complaints in 2020 about workplace Covid safety, including disciplinary action that ended with a final written warning and an appeal rejected no later than 31 August 2021. Early conciliation began on 27 January 2022 and the claim form was submitted on 31 March 2022.
For the protected disclosure detriment claim, the tribunal found that the last alleged detriment was the appeal rejection by 31 August 2021. Mr Kumar relied on the Trust's internal process still being ongoing, but he had not suggested that he was unaware of his right to bring a claim or of the relevant time limits. The tribunal concluded that it had not been shown that presenting the claim in time was not reasonably practicable.
The disability discrimination claim was framed as a failure to make reasonable adjustments for Long Covid. The tribunal accepted that by 25 March 2021 the relevant adjustments had been made, including shortened operating lists and no participation in the on-call rota. It found a substantial delay and held that waiting for the internal complaints process was not enough, particularly where the written internal complaint focused on disciplinary action and not reasonable adjustments. The tribunal declined to extend time on just and equitable grounds, and dismissed the claims.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | Claim for detriments at work as a result of making protected disclosures was dismissed because it was presented out of time and the tribunal was not satisfied that it had not been reasonably practicable to present it in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Reasonable adjustments disability discrimination claim relating to Long Covid was dismissed because it was presented out of time and the tribunal was not satisfied that it was just and equitable to extend time. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
10 references- section 47B Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 48 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 207B Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 123 Equality Act 2010
- reasonably practicable
- just and equitable
- Palmer and anor v Southend-on-Sea Borough Council 1984 ICR 372
- John Lewis Partnership v Charman EAT 0079/11
- Robertson v Bexley Community Centre [2003] EWCA Civ 576
- Adedeji v University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust 2021 EWCA Civ 23
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.