Mr I C Cirstea v A Team Ph Ltd — 2024

Case reference: 2301135/2020
Decision date: 16 February 2024
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Tsamados Date

Indexed: 21 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr I C Cirstea

Respondent

A Team Ph Ltd

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

In a short judgment dated 16 February 2024, Employment Judge Tsamados recorded that the claim brought by Mr I C Cirstea against A-Team PH LTD (in voluntary liquidation) was struck out. The reason given was that the claim had not been actively pursued.

The tribunal noted that by a letter dated 11 November 2022 it had given the claimant an opportunity to make written representations, or to request a hearing, explaining why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.

No substantive merits issue was decided and no monetary remedy was awarded. The judgment therefore records only the procedural disposal of the claim by strike out.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	The tribunal did not identify the underlying cause of action in the extracted text. The claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued and the claimant did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing after the letter dated 11 November 2022.	Struck out	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.