Case 2301139/2022 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Mr R Wright — 2022
- Case reference
- 2301139/2022
- Decision date
- 26 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Siddall Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case by video at Croydon on 26 July 2022 before Employment Judge Siddall. It recorded that Mr Anthony Reely was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment of £5,984.
The tribunal also awarded damages for breach of contract in relation to eleven weeks' notice pay in the gross sum of £6,160. In addition, it found that London Bus and Truck Limited had made unlawful deductions from wages and awarded £896 gross for eight days' pay.
A further award of £56 gross was made for half a day's annual leave that had accrued but had not been taken. The total award recorded by the tribunal was £13,096.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Statutory redundancy payment awarded. | Upheld | — | £5,984 |
| Breach of contract | Damages for eleven weeks' notice pay awarded gross. | Upheld | — | £6,160 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Award for eight days' pay as unlawful deductions from wages. | Upheld | — | £896 |
| Holiday pay | Award for half a day's annual leave that had accrued but had not been taken. | Upheld | — | £56 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £13,096
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.