Case 2301162/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Pearce, solicitor For the v Respondent — 2023
- Case reference
- 2301162/2022
- Decision date
- 29 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tueje BETWEEN
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr Pearce, solicitor For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that, for the reasons given in the oral judgment at the hearing, the claim for unfair dismissal was well-founded and allowed. No separate written reasoning is set out in the short written judgment, but the outcome was that the claimant succeeded on the unfair dismissal claim.
At the announcement of judgment, the parties agreed compensation figures of a basic award of £9,216 and a compensatory award of £4,703. The tribunal also ordered an additional uplift of £3,479.75, assessed at 25%, for the respondent's unreasonable failure to comply with the ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures 2015.
The tribunal further found that the claimant contributed to her dismissal by her conduct to the extent of 25%, and the basic and compensatory awards were reduced by £3,479.75. The final compensation ordered was £13,919.00. The Recoupment Regulations were said to apply, with the prescribed element identified as £4,703.00 for the period from 4 February 2022 to 3 November 2023, and the amount by which the total award exceeded the prescribed element stated as £9,216.00.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the unfair dismissal claim well-founded and allowed it. The parties agreed the underlying figures at the hearing: basic award £9,216, compensatory award £4,703, and a 25% uplift of £3,479.75 for unreasonable failure to comply with the ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures 2015. The tribunal also applied a 25% reduction for contributory conduct, resulting in final compensation of £13,919. | Upheld | — | £13,919 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £13,919
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £9,216
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £4,703
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.