Case 2301165/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr W Taylor - Doyle v Sevenoaks Leisure Limited t/a Sencio– in liquidation — 2024
- Case reference
- 2301165/2023
- Decision date
- 6 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Corrigan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr W Taylor - Doyle
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal issued a Rule 21 judgment finding that Mr W Taylor-Doyle was constructively unfairly dismissed by Sevenoaks Leisure Limited t/a Sencio (in liquidation). No separate factual reasons are set out in the extracted text beyond that conclusion.
The tribunal awarded compensation of £5,616.80. It comprised a basic award of £4,282.50, calculated as 5 x 1.5 x £571, and a compensatory award of £1,334.30.
The compensatory award was broken down into £1,252.86 for net pay lost from 31 December 2022 to 18 January 2023, calculated at 14 days x £89.49 net pay per day, plus £81.44 for pension contributions at 6.5% of the net pay loss. The extracted text does not record any separate award for unlawful deduction from wages.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment states the claimant was 'constructively unfairly dismissed'. It records compensation of '£5,616,80', which appears to be a typographical error; the component figures total £5,616.80. | Upheld | — | £5,617 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,617
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £4,283
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £1,334
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.