Case 2301167/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Douglas v Royal Mail Group Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 2301167/2025
- Decision date
- 15 August 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Atkins
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Douglas
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal dismissed the claim for automatic unfair dismissal, finding that it was not well founded and failed.
The Tribunal upheld the claim of unauthorised deductions in respect of unpaid overtime pay. The Respondent was ordered to pay the Claimant the gross sum of £539.11.
Reasons were given orally at the hearing, and the written judgment records that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within the stated period.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment describes this as a claim for automatic unfair dismissal which was not well founded and failed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment describes this as a claim of unauthorised deductions in respect of unpaid overtime pay, which was well founded and succeeded. | Upheld | — | £539 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £539
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.