Case 2301181/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Mr P Burridge (Director) — 2021
- Case reference
- 2301181/2020
- Decision date
- 9 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Webster Appearances
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal upheld Mr Lee's claims against Lined Out Ltd for a statutory redundancy payment, notice pay, unlawful deductions from wages in respect of unpaid wages and pension contributions, holiday pay, and failure to provide a written statement of terms under s1 Employment Rights Act 1996 / s38 ERA 1996. The claims against Coolertech Ltd and Boxed Freeze Ltd were not upheld because the tribunal found they were not the claimant's employer.
All figures were stated in gross terms. Lined Out Ltd was ordered to pay £1,080 for statutory redundancy payment, £720 for notice pay, £1,440 for unpaid wages, £360 for holiday pay, £430.58 for unauthorised deductions in respect of pension contributions, and £1,440 for failure to provide a written statement of terms, making a total award of £5,470.58.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Gross award for unpaid wages. | Upheld | — | £1,440 |
| Redundancy | Upheld against Lined Out Ltd. Claims against Coolertech Ltd and Boxed Freeze Ltd were not upheld because they were not the claimant's employer. | Upheld | — | £1,080 |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay awarded by the tribunal; gross sum. | Upheld | — | £720 |
| Holiday pay | Holiday pay appears in the remedy list as a separate gross sum. | Upheld | — | £360 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Gross award for unauthorised deductions in respect of employee pension contributions. | Upheld | — | £431 |
| Other | Failure to provide a written statement of terms contrary to s1 Employment Rights Act 1996 / s38 ERA 1996. | Upheld | — | £1,440 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,471
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.