Case 2301187/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss E Francis v Amazing Productions Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 2301187/2021
- Decision date
- 8 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rice-Birchall Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss E Francis
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a strike-out judgment in the case of Miss E Francis v Amazing Productions Ltd. The Tribunal recorded that, by letter dated 5 December 2023, the Claimant had been given an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued.
The Claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the Tribunal held that the claim should be struck out. The judgment does not record any substantive findings on the underlying merits of the claim, and it does not state any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment is a strike-out decision under rule 37 for failure to actively pursue the claim. The underlying substantive claim type is not stated in the extracted text. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.