Case 2301191/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Williams v HD Business Services Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2301191/2020
- Decision date
- 6 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hyams-Parish
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Williams
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 6 October 2020, Employment Judge Hyams-Parish issued a Rule 21 judgment in favour of Mr S Williams. The tribunal found that HD Business Services Ltd had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £8,949.20.
That sum was broken down in the judgment as £4,287.50 for unpaid wages, £461.70 for holiday pay, and £4,200.00 for notice pay. The judgment does not give further reasons in the extracted text, but it records the monetary components of the award.
The tribunal also ordered the respondent to pay redundancy pay of £8,400.00. The judgment states that the claimant is responsible for any tax and national insurance due on the sums, if any.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The award of £8,949.20 was made up of £4,287.50 unpaid wages, £461.70 holiday pay, and £4,200.00 notice pay. | Upheld | — | £8,949 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal also ordered payment of redundancy pay in the sum of £8,400.00. | Upheld | — | £8,400 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £17,349
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.