Case 2301192/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr O EZEH v Sainsbury’s Supermarkets Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2301192/2022
- Decision date
- 30 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ramsden
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr O EZEH
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim. It had previously written to the claimant on 2 August 2023 giving him an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out.
The reasons identified in that letter were that the claims appeared to have been brought outside the primary statutory time limits, that the Tribunal therefore lacked jurisdiction to determine them, and that the claimant had failed to comply with Employment Judge Ramsden's orders made and explained on 26 June 2023.
The Tribunal recorded that the claimant had not made written representations, had not made sufficient representations, and had not requested a hearing. The claim was therefore struck out.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the claim was struck out. The specific claim type is identified from the gov.uk listing category rather than enumerated in the judgment text. | Struck out | — | — |
| Age discrimination | The judgment states that the claim was struck out. The protected characteristic is identified from the gov.uk listing category rather than enumerated in the judgment text. | Struck out | Age | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the claim was struck out. The protected characteristic is identified from the gov.uk listing category rather than enumerated in the judgment text. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment states that the claim was struck out. The protected characteristic is identified from the gov.uk listing category rather than enumerated in the judgment text. | Struck out | Race | — |
| Sex discrimination | The judgment states that the claim was struck out. The protected characteristic is identified from the gov.uk listing category rather than enumerated in the judgment text. | Struck out | Sex | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.