Case 2301202/2019 · Employment Tribunal

Miss E Gradzik v Hall and Woodhouse Limited and 1 other — 2021

Case reference: 2301202/2019
Decision date: 24 August 2021
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Pritchard JUDGMENT

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

3 named

Claimant

Miss E Gradzik

Respondents

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The Claimant’s claim against Hall and Woodhouse Limited was dismissed upon withdrawal. The judgment records no substantive findings or award against that respondent in this decision.

Under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013, Employment Judge Pritchard entered judgment that South Coast Pub Company Limited unfairly dismissed Miss E Gradzik. The judgment states that the case would be listed for a hearing to consider remedy, so no monetary award was fixed at this stage.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

This case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unfair dismissal	The claim against the First Respondent was dismissed upon withdrawal.	Dismissed	—	—
Unfair dismissal	Judgment was entered under Rule 21 that the Second Respondent unfairly dismissed the Claimant; the case was to be listed for a hearing on remedy.	Upheld	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.