Case 2301209/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Humpherson v The Club Group Collection — 2023
- Case reference
- 2301209/2022
- Decision date
- 11 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Balogun
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Humpherson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a procedural judgment only. Employment Judge Balogun recorded that the response was struck out because it had not been actively pursued and the Respondent had failed to comply with the Tribunal’s orders. The Tribunal had previously given the Respondent an opportunity by letter dated 3 January 2022 to make representations or request a hearing as to why strike out should not follow.
The Respondent did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, to avoid strike out. The judge therefore ordered that the response be struck out and stated that the scheduled hearing on 16 January 2023 would go ahead. The Respondent would not be allowed to defend the claim and would only be permitted to participate to the extent allowed by the hearing judge. The judgment does not decide the underlying substantive claims on their merits or record any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment states that 'the response is struck out'. It does not determine the substantive claims on their merits. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.