Case 2301210/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Home Comfort Care Agency Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2301210/2023
- Decision date
- 8 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge O’Neill Representation
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at London South by CVP on 19 December 2023 before Employment Judge O’Neill, with Anika Cheema-Shergill appearing in person and Home Comfort Care Agency Limited represented by its director, Mr Florin Mihai. The tribunal dealt with claims under case numbers 2301210/2023 and 2301363/2023.
The tribunal found that the claimant’s claims for unlawful deductions from wages and breach of contract were well founded and succeeded. It awarded £2,040 for three weeks' unpaid wages and £680 in lieu of one week's notice, making a total award of £2,720 before tax.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the claim for unlawful deductions from wages was well founded and awarded £2,040 for 3 weeks' unpaid wages. | Upheld | — | £2,040 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the breach of contract claim was well founded and awarded £680 in lieu of 1 week's notice. | Upheld | — | £680 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,720
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.