Case 2301212/2022 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Mr R Wright — 2022
- Case reference
- 2301212/2022
- Decision date
- 26 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Siddall Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment in Mr Wayne Bond v London Bus and Truck Limited, heard at Croydon by video on 26 July 2022 before Employment Judge Siddall, records four successful monetary claims. The tribunal held that the claimant was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment of £13,328.
It also awarded damages for breach of contract in relation to twelve weeks' notice pay in the sum of £6,528 gross. In addition, the tribunal found that the respondent had made unlawful deductions from wages and awarded eight days' pay of £870.40 gross.
The tribunal further awarded £217.60 gross for annual leave that had accrued but had not been taken. The judgment states that the total award to the claimant was £20,944. The extracted text sets out the awards and totals but does not give detailed reasoning for each head of claim.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £13,328 |
| Breach of contract | Awarded as damages in relation to twelve weeks' notice pay, gross. | Upheld | — | £6,528 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Awarded as eight days' pay, gross. | Upheld | — | £870 |
| Holiday pay | Awarded in relation to pay for annual leave that had accrued but had not been taken, gross. | Upheld | — | £218 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £20,944
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.